A list of all blind-accessible videogames

index.md

A list of all blind-accessible videogames

This is a list of every videogame accessible to the blind. For purposes of this article, blind means someone with no usable vision. For every game, its level of accessibility will be described next to it.

For some games there is not enough information so feel free to leave your experiences in the comments. Also, if you know of any other blind-accessible games that aren't on this list, please write them down in the comments. You can also message me on Discord (my username is: molitvan).

This was originally started on June 18th, 2024 in the form of this Reddit thread and has since been moved here. A website for this list and more is planned in the future. Stay tuned!

Join the Discord

For updates, questions and discussions about the list and the games on it, you can join the Discord server

The list has moved

As of February 26th, 2026, the list has been moved to this GitHub repo. This gist won't be deleted for historical purposes as well as to make sure the list's position in search engines isn't affected by the move.

From reading Can I Play That on a fairly regular basis, I do think there needs to be some sort of grading system if there is to include people with partial sight. The spectrum is so wide that one ‘blind’ person will be able to play a game whereas the next won’t. The Gamers Without Sight principle is, if someone completely without sight can play it, anyone with even a little sight will be able to play it. Broadening the scope might end up in with the same situation as Can I Play That in that there is such a wide range of solutions for such a range of access needs, and diluting the usefulness of the information. the quality of specificity, IE, Can A Gamer Without Sight either A, complete this game independently or B, play to a competitive level in sporting or racing games, needs to be front and centre, in my view, at least. The list, as is stands is great as it is specific to sightless play and is specific to mainstream games where accessibility has been included rather than been made the centre of the game. I’m not interested in games for the blind, they’re boring. I want to play games sighted friends do, to play with them or against them. I also don’t want to hear a game is playable by the blind when it requires sight to do so. Starting from the absolute lack of sight in the gamer is a catch all. Just some thoughts on where this could go to be useful. I certainly think there is a space for sighted blind, but it needs to be carefully positioned and structured to avoid the fully blind being sidelined… Again.

I definitely agree that being fully accessible for the fully blind is the bare minimum requirement and should not be sidelined. I think that would be the premise here and sign under it. However, players with low vision may also rely and fully enjoy playing games with their sight and it would be very valuable to provide this information to them if there are features that target to people with varying degrees of sight. The same thing for deaf players or hard of hearing. It will be important to know if the game has settings to adjust pitch and volume, choose stereo versus mono sound or choose to send the sound only to one ear, or even if it has screen-reader accessible, read at your pace dialogues, or transcripts you can check in your journal with past dialogues (e.g. so you can review a dialogue or read it at your pace with your braille display, instead of having to only rely on voice acting). I think those players can also be sidelined a lot and believe that we should think of everyone when possible - and inform everyone if the game is accessible and enjoyable for them as well.

This takes extra work, of course, but it also raises awareness that not all blind players are the same.

Ideally, the bare minimum would be being accessible to deafblind players by default, but we all know that "niche" is still miles away from making its own website...

I’d say that scope, at first, is probably too wide. The reason I love this list so much is it fits gamers without sight. It’s neat. No variation. I’m sure there can be resources for sighted blind, but considering they can play the games the sightless players can’t whilst the sightless can’t play the games they can, it makes more sense to me to focus exclusively on sightless play… Obviously, I’m biased. I’m just bored of watching youtube videos entitled ‘blind player plays… *incert game name*’,only to find that they can see which,for those who are without sight, is a hard limit. If a sightless player can play it, everyone (assuming no other disabilities) should be able to play. In project work it is far better to have narrow scope and get that bang on before broadening. Can I PLay That, as good as it work is, is a bit of a nothing burger unless you have exactly the same disability as the reviewer. For example, they spoke about the screen reader on the PS Portal without specifying it only works when you’re in the cloud and doesn’t work on the rest of the device—an important distinction which was overlooked. I could hardly expect them to cover all angles,it’s simply too huge a job.

…

On 19 Dec 2025, at 19:31, uxaccess ***@***.***> wrote: @uxaccess commented on this gist. From reading Can I Play That on a fairly regular basis, I do think there needs to be some sort of grading system if there is to include people with partial sight. The spectrum is so wide that one ‘blind’ person will be able to play a game whereas the next won’t. The Gamers Without Sight principle is, if someone completely without sight can play it, anyone with even a little sight will be able to play it. Broadening the scope might end up in with the same situation as Can I Play That in that there is such a wide range of solutions for such a range of access needs, and diluting the usefulness of the information. the quality of specificity, IE, Can A Gamer Without Sight either A, complete this game independently or B, play to a competitive level in sporting or racing games, needs to be front and centre, in my view, at least. The list, as is stands is great as it is specific to sightless play and is specific to mainstream games where accessibility has been included rather than been made the centre of the game. I’m not interested in games for the blind, they’re boring. I want to play games sighted friends do, to play with them or against them. I also don’t want to hear a game is playable by the blind when it requires sight to do so. Starting from the absolute lack of sight in the gamer is a catch all. Just some thoughts on where this could go to be useful. I certainly think there is a space for sighted blind, but it needs to be carefully positioned and structured to avoid the fully blind being sidelined… Again. I agree that being fully accessible for the fully blind is the bare minimum requirement and should not be sidelined. I think that would be the premise here. However, players with low vision may also rely and fully enjoy playing games with their sight and it would be very valuable to provide this information to them if there are features that target to people with varying degrees of sight. The same thing for deaf players or hard of hearing. It will be important to know if the game has settings to adjust pitch and volume, choose stereo versus mono sound or choose to send the sound only to one ear, or even if it has screen-reader accessible, read at your pace dialogues, or transcripts you can check in your journal with past dialogues (e.g. so you can review a dialogue or read it at your pace with your braille display, instead of having to only rely on voice acting). I think those players can also be sidelined a lot and believe that we should think of everyone when possible - and inform everyone if the game is accessible and enjoyable for them as well. This takes extra work, of course, but it also raises awareness that not all blind players are the same. Ideally, the bare minimum would be being accessible to deafblind players by default, but we all know that "niche" is still miles away from making its own website... — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://gist.github.com/Molitvan/50e3b5060ab9465b1da895155d5c0480#gistcomment-5912175> or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADWY2TBMZZQ2WWWJDZOJD4D4CRHB3BFKMF2HI4TJMJ2XIZLTSOBKK5TBNR2WLKJSGQYTEMJSGE3DNJDOMFWWLKDBMN2G64S7NFSIFJLWMFWHKZNEORZHKZNENZQW2ZN3ORUHEZLBMRPXAYLSORUWG2LQMFXHIX3BMN2GS5TJOR4YFJLWMFWHKZNEM5UXG5FENZQW2ZNLORUHEZLBMRPXI6LQMWWHG5LCNJSWG5C7OR4XAZNLI5UXG5CDN5WW2ZLOOSTHI33QNFRXHEMCUR2HS4DFURTWS43UUV3GC3DVMWUTCMZXGE4TOMZQGKTXI4TJM5TWK4VGMNZGKYLUMU>. You are receiving this email because you commented on the thread. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

I agree with @OlzKennett here. I think that including low vision and legally blind players would make the scope too wide and personally I'm not sure if I'd be willing to spend time on such a project, at least not currently. As someone who has went from being low vision to legally blind to now pretty much no usable vision at all, I think that low vision and legally blind players already have a lot of resources and a lot more resources than we do while there's a severe lack of resources for fully blind players.
And don't get me wrong. I'm not saying screw low vision and legally blind players and players with other disabilities, what I'm saying is that I think the best thing for this project is to focus exclusively on fully blind players and exclusively on mainstream (non-blind-specific) games as it does currently.

Also @uxaccess I'm personally not a fan of separating the list into sections like that while it's still here on GitHub Gists, although if people want it I'll do it. The reason why is I think it makes it a bit slower to browse.

I think the nice thing is, if you keep the scope tight, there could be other resources that link through where they themselves include the wider spectrum of sight loss. I think that, with so few totally blind about, it is important to keep a hard boundary as its often subsumed by the volume of the partially sighted. This isn’t a reflection on anyone, it’s a simple issue of numbers and the louder voice of the majority. Sorry to return to it—sounds like a brag—but I’m loving the XBox Ally and am working out some interesting ways of using button remapping to hook into NVDA for OCR etc. I’d be more than willing to write a couple of guides on setting stuff up and sharing configs. The handheld, I believe, is the perfect fit for GWS: Doesn’t expect much in graphics, no need for extra hardware and, they’re just neat though, the set up is a little fiddly. An addition to the list, or possible… Though it’s not a game in itself, Retroarch has screenreader hooks built in now and an OCR. I’ve not played with it much but seems promising. Also, I can’t get it running with screen reader through steam for some reason.

…

On 19 Dec 2025, at 20:21, Vjeran Bezik ***@***.***> wrote: @Molitvan commented on this gist. I agree with @OlzKennett <https://github.com/OlzKennett> here. I think that including low vision and legally blind players would make the scope too wide and personally I'm not sure if I'd be willing to spend time on such a project, at least not currently. As someone who has went from being low vision to legally blind to now pretty much no usable vision at all, I think that low vision and legally blind players already have a lot of resources and a lot more resources than we do while there's a severe lack of resources for fully blind players. And don't get me wrong. I'm not saying screw low vision and legally blind players and players with other disabilities, what I'm saying is that I think the best thing for this project is to focus exclusively on fully blind players and exclusively on mainstream (non-blind-specific) games as it does currently. Also @uxaccess <https://github.com/uxaccess> I'm personally not a fan of separating the list into sections like that while it's still here on GitHub Gists, although if people want it I'll do it. The reason why is I think it makes it a bit slower to browse. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://gist.github.com/Molitvan/50e3b5060ab9465b1da895155d5c0480#gistcomment-5912224> or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADWY2TBDRDR6ONONZ76E5RD4CRM5JBFHORZGSZ3HMVZKMY3SMVQXIZNMON2WE2TFMN2F65DZOBS2WR3JON2EG33NNVSW45FGORXXA2LDOOIYFJDUPFYGLJDHNFZXJJLWMFWHKZNJGEZTOMJZG4ZTAMVKMF2HI4TJMJ2XIZLTSOBKK5TBNR2WLKBYGIYDGNZRGU22I3TBNVS2QYLDORXXEX3JMSBKK5TBNR2WLJDUOJ2WLJDOMFWWLO3UNBZGKYLEL5YGC4TUNFRWS4DBNZ2F6YLDORUXM2LUPGBKK5TBNR2WLJDHNFZXJJDOMFWWLK3UNBZGKYLEL52HS4DF>. You are receiving this email because you were mentioned. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

I've noticed that Brok the InvestiGator hasn't yet been added to this list! I recommend adding it.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/949480/BROK_the_InvestiGator/

I've noticed that Brok the InvestiGator hasn't yet been added to this list! I recommend adding it.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/949480/BROK_the_InvestiGator/

Oh shit... Thank you! I'm pretty sure it was on here at some point but idk how it disappeared.

hi! great to see this work. i would like to add the nfl games. they have an inbuild screenreader
and by the way diablo 4 is fully accessible! i am playing through and it is perfect even in dungeons which sometimes are more challenging but manageable.

how good is elder scrolls online withe the fco accessibility mod?

I've noticed that Brok the InvestiGator hasn't yet been added to this list! I recommend adding it.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/949480/BROK_the_InvestiGator/

Oh shit... Thank you! I'm pretty sure it was on here at some point but idk how it disappeared.

No worries! By the way, did my comment with the reorganized list cause problems with navigating this page (just as a comment, not in the list)? I didn't mean to cause them. I just navigate better myself with this reorganization.

I literally just was about to make this list myself but have found several more mods on here I had no clue about.
Having the seperate groups is useful but probably better once it becomes a website rather then a gist.
I wonder if some sort of email list for this would be worth it so people can be notified when new games become accessible.

You can subscribe to comments, as I have, hence replying.

…

On 29 Dec 2025, at 09:56, Isaac-Leonard ***@***.***> wrote: @Isaac-Leonard commented on this gist. I literally just was about to make this list myself but have found several more mods on here I had no clue about. Having the seperate groups is useful but probably better once it becomes a website rather then a gist. I wonder if some sort of email list for this would be worth it so people can be notified when new games become accessible. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://gist.github.com/Molitvan/50e3b5060ab9465b1da895155d5c0480#gistcomment-5923783> or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADWY2TFTGJJ3GZI4R5IQQR34ED3DFBFHORZGSZ3HMVZKMY3SMVQXIZNMON2WE2TFMN2F65DZOBS2WR3JON2EG33NNVSW45FGORXXA2LDOOIYFJDUPFYGLJDHNFZXJJLWMFWHKZNJGEZTOMJZG4ZTAMVKMF2HI4TJMJ2XIZLTSOBKK5TBNR2WLKBSGI2TMOJZGM22I3TBNVS2QYLDORXXEX3JMSBKK5TBNR2WLJDUOJ2WLJDOMFWWLO3UNBZGKYLEL5YGC4TUNFRWS4DBNZ2F6YLDORUXM2LUPGBKK5TBNR2WLJDHNFZXJJDOMFWWLK3UNBZGKYLEL52HS4DF>. You are receiving this email because you commented on the thread. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.

hi! great to see this work. i would like to add the nfl games. they have an inbuild screenreader and by the way diablo 4 is fully accessible! i am playing through and it is perfect even in dungeons which sometimes are more challenging but manageable.
Thanks. Regarding NFL, is the gameplay also accessible or do they just have menu narration? Also about Diablo, I think not having nav assist in dungeons + some other things like the map being a pain to use are enough to say that it's mostly accessible since it can make a lot of the parts of the game frustrating or just take way longer than they're supposed to. A lot of other people, even on Sightless Slayers have a similar opinion.

how good is elder scrolls online withe the fco accessibility mod?
Didn't that mod get abandoned and never finished? I could be wrong though and I very much hope I am lol. Can you link to where you found the mod?

I've noticed that Brok the InvestiGator hasn't yet been added to this list! I recommend adding it.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/949480/BROK_the_InvestiGator/

Oh shit... Thank you! I'm pretty sure it was on here at some point but idk how it disappeared.

No worries! By the way, did my comment with the reorganized list cause problems with navigating this page (just as a comment, not in the list)? I didn't mean to cause them. I just navigate better myself with this reorganization.

Nah it didn't cause any problems don't worry

I literally just was about to make this list myself but have found several more mods on here I had no clue about. Having the seperate groups is useful but probably better once it becomes a website rather then a gist. I wonder if some sort of email list for this would be worth it so people can be notified when new games become accessible.

Good idea. I'll look into that. I'll also make a Discord server today.

I made a Discord server for the list. You can join to get updates whenever new games are added, talk, ask questions etc. Join at https://go.molitvan.me/AccessibleGamesDiscord

Hello, and thanks for the great list! My public repositories are blind-accessible games, and so is Periphery Synthetic. Cheers!

Hello, and thanks for the great list! My public repositories are blind-accessible games, and so is Periphery Synthetic. Cheers!

Hi and thank you for the suggestions. Are those games mainstream games or audio games/games made specifically for the blind?

Absolutely amazing, thank you! If you need any help, please ask, it's a great initiative!

Hey y’all, I love this list of games. I do have a question about Fortnite. My boyfriend wants me to play it with him. I’m fully blind obviously lol my question is is can you use the FA 11 Y mod with the epic game launcher version of Fortnite? I tried to download it through the legendary thing included in the FA 11 Y folder but for some reason, it keeps telling me I don’t have the game in my library so I’m just wondering if it’ll still work with the epic games launcher version of Fortnite or if anybody has any information that’ll help cause I would really like to play this game with my boyfriend. It’s just trying to get this man to work has been rather troublesome so thank you for your help. Appreciate everything.

On iOS, King of Dragon Pass, Six Ages, and Six Ages 2 are all accessible via VoiceOver.

Hi, I was wondering if anybody has had any issues with the Final Fantasy mod for Final Fantasy nine? I clicked the link and it takes me to the Final Fantasy six green readers mod and then when I go down to where it says, there’s a separate download here I click that and it just refresh this page to the top and so I’m wondering if anybody else has figured this out or if I’m supposed to use the Final Fantasy 6 mile? Any help would be greatly appreciated thank you.