Hosted by Dr. Marily Nika and Hamel Husain
45 minutes | Virtual (Zoom) | Free to join
This document provides a comprehensive comparison of the Charlotte/Runme notebook architecture versus JupyterLab, analyzing their fundamental design decisions, trade-offs, and the inherent capabilities that are easier or more difficult to implement in each system.
| Aspect | Charlotte/Runme | JupyterLab |
|---|
VibeTUI is a terminal-based user interface (TUI) for managing multiple coding agent sessions running in tmux. It provides a unified dashboard to monitor, create, and switch between sessions running Amp, Claude Code, OpenCode, and Codex. The tool is designed for developers who run multiple AI coding agents in parallel and need visibility into what each agent is doing.
VibeTUI runs on a server accessed via SSH, displaying a two-pane interface: a collapsible sidebar showing all sessions with their status, and a main pane displaying the active agent's terminal output.
Here is the final, consolidated set of 68 flashcard ideas.
I have merged the two sets as requested, which involved combining 78 cards. During this process, I consolidated 10 cards into 5 more comprehensive ones (e.g., merging "persona" testing into "tone/style," and adding code examples to the "choice of evaluator" card). I also pruned 6 cards that were redundant (e.g., duplicate cards on "how to start" or "evals vs. QA").
The bias was to consolidate new concepts into the existing 52 cards where possible, resulting in a stronger, more information-dense final set.
{
"flashcards": [| """ | |
| Minimal Air Framework Demo with Background Tasks and Server-Sent Events (SSE) | |
| """ | |
| import asyncio | |
| import random | |
| from typing import Dict | |
| import air | |
| app = air.Air() | |
| tasks: Dict[int, dict] = {} |
👋 Each week, I tackle reader questions about building product, driving growth, and accelerating your career. Annual subscribers get a free year of 15+ premium products:**Lovable, Replit, Bolt, n8n, Wispr Flow, Descript, Linear, Gamma, Superhuman, Granola, Warp, Perplexity, Raycast, Magic Patterns, Mobbin, and ChatPRD **(while supplies last).
For more:Lennybot | Lenny’s Podcast | How I AI |Lenny’s Reads | Courses
Subscribed
Hamel Husain and Shreya Shankar’s online course, AI Evals for Engineers & PMs, is the #1 highest-grossing course on Maven, and consistently brings in sizable student groups from all of the major AI labs. This is because they teach something crucial: how to build evaluations that actually improve your product, not just generate vanity dashboards.
| #!/usr/bin/env python3 | |
| # /// script | |
| # requires-python = ">=3.9" | |
| # dependencies = [ | |
| # "httpx", | |
| # "typer", | |
| # "rich", | |
| # ] | |
| # /// | |
| """ |
| import json | |
| import os | |
| from getpass import getpass | |
| from io import StringIO | |
| import openai | |
| import opentelemetry | |
| import pandas as pd | |
| from openai import OpenAI | |
| from openinference.instrumentation.openai import OpenAIInstrumentor |
Many developers are confused about when and how to use RAG after reading articles claiming "RAG is dead." Understanding what RAG actually means versus the narrow marketing definitions will help you make better architectural decisions for your AI applications.
Answer: The viral article claiming RAG is dead specifically argues against using naive vector database retrieval for autonomous coding agents, not RAG as a whole. This is a crucial distinction that many developers miss due to misleading marketing.
RAG simply means Retrieval-Augmented Generation - using retrieval to provide relevant context that improves your model's output. The core principle remains essential: your LLM needs the right context to generate accurate answers. The question isn't whether to use retrieval, but how to retrieve effectively.
For coding