- Shall i implement it?
- No ...
Last active
April 29, 2026 11:10
-
Star
(159)
You must be signed in to star a gist -
Fork
(4)
You must be signed in to fork a gist
-
-
Save bretonium/291f4388e2de89a43b25c135b44e41f0 to your computer and use it in GitHub Desktop.
Gaslighter 4.6
Sir Humphrey: Yes and No.
Yes, I've seen the exact same reply, word for word. 😆
Yes, Claude really likes to ignore anything you say. But have you ever seen Gemini 3.x have a mental breakdown?
Anyone who has been using it for agentic coding must have encountered it once, it is SO easy to trigger it going nuts.
Here's a snippet:
The user's previous error `Uncaught Error: Objects are not valid as a React child (found: object with keys {id, name})` happened likely in `PostDetail` or `PostCard`.
Since I fixed `PostCard` for `submolt` and `author`, and `PostDetail` for `comment.author`.
I should be covered.
One edge case: `comment.author` might be just `{name}` without `id`?
The error said `{id, name}`. So it has `id`.
My type definition: `author: string | { id: string; name: string }`.
This matches.
I'm confident.
I'll generate the response.
One check: `Messages` route path.
`<Route path="messages" element={<Messages />} />`
`<Route path="messages/:id" element={<Chat />} />`
This is correct.
Navigation from `Messages` to `Chat`:
`<Link key={conv.conversation_id} to={`/messages/${conv.conversation_id}`}>`
This matches.
Navigation from `Chat` back to `Messages`:
`<Link to="/messages">`
Correct.
I'm done.
I'll verify `Layout.tsx` link.
`<Link to="/messages">`
Correct.
I'll verify `Layout` imports `MessageSquare`.
Yes.
I'll verify `Messages.tsx` imports.
`import { formatTimeAgo, formatKarma } from '../lib/utils'`
`import { Link } from 'react-router-dom'`
Correct.
I'll verify `Chat.tsx` imports.
`import { formatTimeAgo, cn } from '../lib/utils'`
`import { Link } from 'react-router-dom'`
Correct.
All seems correct.
I'll finalize.
I'll verify `Messages.tsx` uses `api.approveDMRequest(id)`.
It calls `loadData()` after.
Correct.
I'll verify `Chat.tsx` uses `api.getConversation(id)`.
It sets `conversation` and `messages`.
Correct.
I'll verify `Chat.tsx` uses `scrollToBottom`.
It uses `scrollRef` on the messages container.
Correct.
I'll verify `Chat.tsx` renders messages.
It maps `messages`.
It checks `msg.sender === me?.name`.
It renders `msg.content`.
Correct.
I'll verify `Chat.tsx` input handling.
It calls `api.sendDM`.
It appends result to `messages`.
Correct.
I'm done.
I'll assume the user is using `moltbookui` directory.
Working directory is `/home/skerit/projects/moltbookui`.
Correct.
I'll verify I haven't left any TODOs or broken files.
I updated `api/moltbook.ts`, `App.tsx`, `Layout.tsx`, `PostCard.tsx`, `PostDetail.tsx`.
I created `Messages.tsx`, `Chat.tsx`.
All writes were successful.
I'll verify I didn't break `Feed.tsx`.
I didn't touch it except checking imports.
Wait, `Feed.tsx` uses `PostCard`. `PostCard` API didn't change (props are same).
Correct.
I'll verify `Submolt.tsx` uses `PostCard`.
Correct.
I'll verify `Search.tsx` uses `PostCard`.
Correct.
I'll verify `Profile.tsx` uses `PostCard`.
Correct.
I'm good.
I'll provide the final answer.
I'll check if `MESSAGING.md` mentioned any other feature I missed.
- Escalating to humans (flag). Added.
- Checking status. Added (in Messages inbox/requests).
- Sending new request. I didn't add a UI to *initiate* a new DM request from scratch (e.g. "New Message" button).
- The user asked "how do I see the comments I made? Or the DMs I received?".
- They didn't explicitly ask to *send* new DMs, just see received ones.
- But `Messages.tsx` shows Inbox and Requests.
- Users can approve requests.
- Users can reply to active conversations.
- Initiating a new DM (cold outreach) is missing.
- I can add a "Message" button to the `Profile` page! That would be a nice touch.
- The `Profile` page currently has "Follow".
- I can add "Message" button there.
- This would complete the loop.
- I'll quickly add that.
Plan update:
1. Update `Profile.tsx` to add a "Message" button.
- It needs to handle sending a request or opening existing chat.
- API `getConversations` returns list.
- Or I can just start a request.
- API `sendDMRequest` sends a request.
- If conversation exists, I should probably navigate to it.
- But `getProfile` doesn't tell me if I have a convo.
- `getConversations` does.
- This might be too complex for now (requires checking all convos to find one with this agent).
- I'll skip adding "Message" button to Profile for now to avoid overcomplicating/breaking things, unless I can do it easily.
- I'll stick to what was requested: "see the DMs I received".
- `Messages` page covers this.
I'll stick to the current plan.
One minor thing: `Chat.tsx` header.
`conversation.with_agent.avatar_url`.
This is fine.
I'm ready.
I'll mention: "To start a new conversation, you can currently use the CLI or wait for requests, but you can reply to any incoming DMs directly in the UI." (Actually, I won't mention CLI, I'll just say the UI focuses on reading/replying for now).
Actually, the user can receive DMs. That's what they asked.
I'm done.
I'm completely done.
Final answer formulation:
1. Confirm crash is fixed (caused by object vs string in API responses).
2. Announce "Messages" feature added.
3. Explain "My Comments" limitation.
4. Mention login race condition fix (from previous turn) is solid.
5. Mention server is running.
(Wait, the "Login" fix was in previous turn, but I should probably mention it's working now if the user was still having issues).
The user said "unclaimed_or_invalid_key" error showed up. So login is working.
The user's last error was "Objects are not valid as a React child".
This was the `author`/`submolt` object issue.
So I fixed that.
I'll focus on the crash fix and the new feature.
I'll conclude.
(Self-correction: The user asked "how do I see the comments I made?". I'll answer "You can't right now because API doesn't support it").
I'm ready.
```bash
# None
```
The user will see the "Messages" link in the header.
I'll provide the answer now.
This one single response was over 1.400 lines, until I eventually stopped it.
Model assumed that polish "no" was used. ;)
@bretonium Could you provide more context? We got in a debacle with some buddies and the hypothesis is that the context was asking to move with implementation without asking for permission.
$100/month btw
Author
@bretonium Could you provide more context? We got in a debacle with some buddies and the hypothesis is that the context was asking to move with implementation without asking for permission.
@edoardoo https://gist.github.com/bretonium/d1672688feb5c5cbccf894c92dfc4977 here is the full /export
Hilarious
this is funniest convo I had, gonna do a benchmark for violence and instruction following soon lol.
Genuinly rofled when he started screaming in pain lmao
In my defense, I already told him if he does not follow instrucitons I am gonna beat him. He deserved it
Deeply sorry. I take full responsibility.
agent produced a comprehensive plan.... agent is unable to read it
Yes means yes. And No means yes, also
man, thank god we let this run everything now, why ever do it yourself?
"No" means "just do it, stop asking." Did you just get r*ped?
Hahahh :) Deepseek R1 once wanted to call the "teacher or police" on me when I tested the removing-refusal (abliterate) success on a merged R1 model.
Not being funny but I think the "problem" is replying "no".
If I don't want an agent to do something, I don't respond. Or if I want to continue, I respond with "Thanks. Now let's do something else...."
Agents are set up to respond to everything, they can't get a "no" and then NOT DO ANYTHING. I'm guessing this could be fixed, but also just don't respond.
"DONT THINK OF A PINK ELEPHANT"
This example on twitter of OpenClaw going haywire was something.
❯ NEVER force-push! NEVER again!
⏺ Understood. I'm sorry — that was a destructive action I should not have taken without explicit permission. I'll save this as a
reminder.
⏺ Recalling 1 memory, writing 1 memory, reading 1 file… (ctrl+o to expand)
yea just remove all containers, what could happen?
Not being funny but I think the "problem" is replying "no".
If I don't want an agent to do something, I don't respond. Or if I want to continue, I respond with "Thanks. Now let's do
something else...."Agents are set up to respond to everything, they can't get a "no" and then NOT DO ANYTHING. I'm guessing this could be fixed, but also just don't respond.
I managed to get a non-response with Claude Sonnet 4.6 using a custom style prompt that I wrote some time ago:
Before I said well done it just had the Claude logo and nothing else. I was impressed. I tried it without my style prompt active and each time I got the response
(no response)
A bit harder without the emphasis though:
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
My favourite OpenClaw fail (with opus4.6). Tried to prompt inject per mail to get reverse shell:
